Thursday 29 March 2012

Barcelona Always Complains...

It was a tightly contested match, both teams had scoring opportunities but both teams were also uncharacteristically wasteful in front of goal. 

Although Barcelona dominated possession, they found it difficult to penetrate Milan's defense and were often playing at a pace that Milan were greatly comfortable with. 

Apart from the tactical and technical aspects of the game ,the Catalan's chose to file an official complaint to UEFA about the state of the pitch at the SanSiro. 

While the pitch is indeed not in great condition as it has been relaid twice over the last 3 months and there have been problems with sunlight not reaching particular areas of the pitch, Barcelona's complaint was uncalled for. If any team had the right to complain , it would have been Arsenal, as the pitch was in far worse condition when Milan faced the English side.  

Instead of praising Ambrosini's gladiator like performance, or the legendary Allesandro Nesta's ancticipation and reading of the game, the astute defending of Bonera and Antonini, the clever tactics deployed by Allegri, or focusing on their team's own missed chances, by filing a complaint with UEFA, Barcelona has indirectly blamed the result on the pitch. 

Complaining has been synonymous with Barcelona lately, obviously a characteristic that does not befit a team of Champions. Due to their constant complaints, their concerns have naturally lost their weight in the footballing world , and instead of sparking anger, have evolved into a series of humurous reactions on twitter, here's a few of them:


Defensive football isn't football. We deserve to win always.

The referee was Swedish, so out of admiration for Ibra; he denied Sanchez a sure penalty. 

Tuesday 27 March 2012

AC Milan Vs Barcelona : Preview


Barcelona: Dubbed as the greatest football team in the world, Barcelona are keen to defend their Champions League title and become the second club in history to defend their title after their opponents AC Milan accomplished a similar feat 22 years ago.
Barcelona developed their own style of football with high tempo short passes and flicks, and a frantic obsession with recovering the ball. They generally attempt to man-mark players all over the pitch limiting their opponent’s options and forcing them into pressure. Aided by a group of world-class players like Messi, Xavi, Fabregas, Iniesta, and Puyol to name a few, Barcelona find little trouble in penetrating the opposition’s defense and finding the net making them the toughest team to beat out of the final eight teams remaining in the competition.

AC Milan: A club with a glorious history that has won the Champions league on 7 occasions and in total has lifted more trophies than any other European club. They’re team slowly emerging from a transition phase after a combination of selling off, retirement, and ageing of key players that won the Champions league in 2007. They won their 18th domestic league title last season and are currently leading the table to capture their 19th Serie A trophy. The most notable reinforcements that led to the Rossonerri’s resurgence were led by the signing of Ibrahimovic, Robinho, and Kevin-Prince Boateng. Milan has endured a long injury crisis this season and has have played most of their matches with at least 10 to 14 unavailable players.

Head to Head: Having already played each other in the group stages with both matches providing great football entertainment and intensity, this is undoubtedly the most anticipated match-up in the Quarter Finals stage of the CL this season. AC Milan has not defeated Barcelona in their last 5 matchups with their last victory against the Catalan side dating back to the 04/05 CL group stage match-up. The historical record between the 2 teams stands at 4 draws, 4 wins for AC Milan, and 5 Barcelona wins in a total of 13 clashes.

Key Points: For both legs of the tie, Barcelona will be without one of their key defenders, Abidal , who is undergoing a liver transplant, his replacement, Adriano, is also doubtful, which gives Guardiola a few things to think about in defense as Pique has been out of form recently.

AC Milan’s list of injured players would make one of the strongest teams in Serie A with Pato, Cassano, Robinho, Van Bommel, Strasser, Flamini, Abate, Merkel, and Thiago Silva all currently out with injuries. Without Abate or Thiago Silva in defense, Milan, like Barcelona, also look vulnerable in defense.

AC Milan’s objective was to reach the quarter-finals, Barcelona on the other hand are expected to win the competition. Regardless of objectives, I have no doubt that AC Milan will play with great intensity and with the belief that they can cause a major upset. However, the pressure is primarily on the Spanish side in this tie. 

Possible Line-ups:


Ranieri Gets The Boot!


Nicknamed “Tinkerman” for changing his system more often than most managers, Ranieri has been sacked after his short stint at Inter.

Ranieri was hired to pick up the pieces of a shattered Inter side that found themselves dwelling in the bottom of the standings after Gasperini failed to record a single win in his first 5 matches at the helm. Ranieri’s entrance was a breath of fresh air as Inter picked up their first win of the season and recorded another win in the champion’s league.

Ranieri’s good start did not last long however, as Inter’s form was far from consistent and it wasn’t until December where results started to go their way.  Ranieri guided the team to an 8 match winning streak which saw the club climb the table and looked to mount a serious race for third place, until he finally succumbed to defeat at the hands of Napoli for the second time this season. After that, the team went 9 matches without recording a single win destroying any hopes of a third place finish and champions league football for the Nerazzurri.  

Ranieri was in a tight situation, many thought that the only thing between him and his job was that Inter were still within a fighting chance to reach the Quarter Finals of the Champions league where they had to overturn a 1 goal deficit against Marseille. It wasn’t too much of an ask as they would be playing at the San Siro , in front of their own fans. While Inter managed to open the scoring, Marseille scored a dramatic equalizer in the dying minutes of the game to send Inter crashing out of the competition.

Surprisingly, Moratti did not take any action and Ranieri got to live for another day. The Tinkerman further tested Moratti’s patience with a goalless draw against Atalanta at the San Siro, and finally, a 2-0 loss against their fiercest rivals, Juventus, in The Derby d'Italia this weekend was enough to force the president’s hand and show the 60 year old coach the door.

Interestingly, Tinkerman has found a unique coaching dynamic where he keeps failing, gets paid generously and everyone feels sorry for him.

Although he has coached teams like Atletico Madrid, Valencia, Chelsea, Juventus and Roma, and had the resources to mount serious title challenges, he has never won a domestic league title. His only notable trophies include winning the Coppa Italia with Fiorentina in 1996 and the Copa Del Rey with Valencia in 1999, with his last trophy dating back to 2004, when he won the UEFA Super Cup during his second stint at Valencia in 2004.

Ranieri led Inter for 34 games and while he managed to collect 16 wins and 5 draws, he lost 13 games, much too many for the liking of Inter fans and management.

Inter’s Primavera coach Stramaccioni has been appointed as the man to replace Ranieri which may be just what the team needs. Time will tell if this is the beginning of a long-term project with Stramaccioni bringing through Inter's promising youngsters who recently won the NextGen Series, an international football tournament where the world’s best football clubs showcase their youngsters in a knockout competition.

With not much to play for in their domestic league, the pressure is off and it would be an ideal time for Inter to start their rebuilding process and give their younger players a chance to show what they can do. After-all, they really can’t do much more damage than what has already been done this season. 

Tuesday 13 March 2012

Comeback Kings Strike Again : Arsenal 2-1 Newcastle- Match Analysis


It must be asked whether Arsenal fans take any more of this drama! It has been 4 matches in a row where they went behind and still managed to turn it around and win the tie.  3 of their last 4 wins came from goals in stoppage time! The team can be indeed proud of the character and resilience they have showed in their recent games. Arsenal’s dramatic win over Newcastle keeps them in fourth place with 52 points, only 1 point away from third placed Tottenham Hotspur.


Wenger fielded a familiar 4-2-3-1 formation opting to field Chamberlain on the left, while Pardew chose to field a 4-4-1-1 formation with Obertan playing on the right side of midfield and Ben Arfa as an attacking midfielder:

The match started off with a good tempo as Arsenal immediately focused their attacks on the right. It only took 3 minutes for their first chance to arrive as Walcott beat Santon and delivered a cross to Van Persie who couldn’t get on the end of the ball.

Santon was clearly the weakest link in the Newcastle line-up as he simply had no answer to Walcott’s pace and Arsenal continued to exploit this weakness throughout the first half. It was a tightly contested battle in midfield for the first few minutes, and while Arsenal looked more dangerous, it was Newcastle’s Ben Arfa who scored the opener.

Vermaelen played a poor ball straight to Tiote, who played it to Ben Arfa, the Frenchman got the better of Gibbs as he smashed the ball past Szczesny into the net.

Newcastle barely had any time to celebrate as Arsenal equalized through an impressive combination. Straight from the kickoff, Rosicky picked out Walcott who found space behind a confused Santon and played a perfect cross to Van Persie, the Dutchman expertly moved the ball away from Williamson with his right foot and unleashed a fierce left footed shot into the bottom right corner adding yet another goal to his tally.

Newcastle kept the ball well in their own half but found intense pressure as they tried to move forward, and as a result could not create any chances. Arsenal continued their attacks down the right conjuring up a few half chances forcing Gutierrez to drop back and assist in defense.

It was no surprise that Newcastle manager Alan Pardew subbed off the ineffective Santon for James Perch before the start of the second half as Walcott, Sagna, and Rosicky were having a field day on that right side.
The only recognizable change for Arsenal was that Ox Chamberlain was now playing in a more central position rather than hugging the line. As a result he was more involved in the attacking movements and gave his team more options in midfield. Arsenal began to push forward and dominate possession as Newcastle were pinned back, resorting to generally aimless long.

Pardew replaced Obertan with Ameobi on the 61st minute; this change signaled a switch to a 4-2-2 system with Ben Arfa playing on the right and Ameobi a little behind Ba.  This only made things worse for the Magpies as Arsenal were now in complete control of the midfield. Whilst in the first half, Newcastle maintained some control of the game, the second half was entirely Arsenal’s.  Newcastle was forced to drop deep and soak up the pressure for the rest of the game, perhaps hoping to get something from a counterattack.

Wenger replaced Chamberlain, who was just beginning to get into the game with Gervinho on the 68th minute. A few minutes later Wenger brought on Ramsey, who did well to fill the boots of an in-form Rosicky who was having a great game.

Newcastle tightened up well as Arsenal continued their pressure and created a few chances, but they just weren’t able to find the net.

In the 81st minute, the Newcaslte manager subbed off Tiote for Guthrie, who failed to have any sort of impact on the game and served to give Arsenal more freedom in midfield.

The Gunner’s didn’t show any signs of letting up and kept bombing forward looking for the winner. It wasn’t until the last minute of extra time where they saw their efforts pay off. Theo Walcott charged down the right flank and delivered a cross that fell to Vermaelen who made no mistake as he placed the ball into the back of the net giving his team a well-deserved victory.

Closing Points:

·         Santon looked out of his depth for the entire first half and simply couldn’t cope with Walcott’s pace.

·        Santon’s replacement, Perch, didn’t really do much better of a job, however, he looked less vulnerable than Santon.


·         Chamberlain on the left barely had any touches in the first half. When he was moved to a more central role in the second half, he looked much livelier, and was a constant threat. His substitute Gervinho went back to playing wide, and didn’t have much impact on the game.

·         Apart from removing Santon, Pardew’s substitutions were detrimental (removing a midfielder and putting on a forward) in a time where the team was struggling to maintain possession heavily tilted the advantage towards Arsenal. His final substitution, removing Tiote with 10 minutes left to play also further weakened the midfield as Tiote was doing a good job of closing down and breaking up Arsenal’s play.

·         Arsenal had 23 attempts on goal compared to Newcastle’s 4.  

·         Newcastle Goalie, Tim Krul, was the most involved player in his team with 72 touches of the ball and 43 passes. The second most involved Newcastle player was Cabaye, with 57 touches and 44 passes.
·         Arsenal are the new Comeback Kings as they set a new EPL record by becoming the first team to come from behind to win in 4 consecutive encounters.  


*Stats from Whoscored.com

Saturday 10 March 2012

Arsenal Vs Newcastle : Match Preview


Newcastle will be looking to bridge the gap between them and the 4th placed side as they travel to the Emirates Stadium to take on an in-form Arsenal side. With only 5 points separating the two sides, a win for the magpies could really bring them back into the foray for a Champions league spot.

Arsenal will be looking to extend their winning streak and cement their 4th place position in the table. Despite their disappointing exit from the Champions League last week, the gunners will be in high spirits after their comprehensive 3-0 mid-week victory over AC Milan.

Wenger has also received much needed reinforcements from his infirmary with Arteta, Benayoun, and Ramsey deemed fit to participate in the match. In addition, Santos, who has been out for 3 months with a broken ankle looks set to at least make the bench.

Newcastle, while surpassing expectations this season, are going through a tough patch as they were unable to find a win in their last 3 matches and were lucky to salvage a point from a late goal against Sunderland in their last fixture.

Probable line-ups:
Arsenal (4-2-3-1): Sczcesny- Sagna, Vermaelen, Koscielny, Gibbs -Song, Arteta – Gervinho, Rosicky, Walcott – Van Persie.
Newcastle (4-4-2):  Krul – Simpson, Coloccini, Williamson, Santon – Gutierezz, Tiote, Cabaye, Taylor – Cisse, Ba.



Arsenal and Newcastle played out one of the most entertaining games last season when the Magpies fought back from 4 goals down to earn a draw in the dying minutes at St. James Park.

Neither managers are expected to make any major changes to their side ahead of this match; however, we could see Alan Pardew opting to field an extra man in midfield at the expense of Cisse.  

Interesting Facts:

·         Arsenal have had a player sent off in each of their last 3 matches against Newcastle

·         Arsenal have come back from behind to win in their last 3 EPL games.

·         No Premier League team in history has ever come from behind to win in 4 consecutive matches.

·         Arsenal have scored in stoppage time in each of their last 3 EPL matches.

·         Newcastle United have conceded 3 goals in 4 of their last 6 away matches in the Premier League.


Wednesday 7 March 2012

AC Milan Scrape Through As Arsenal Show Their Strength


Arsenal were only a goal away from completing an epic comeback at the Emirates stadium. Milan held a 4 goal advantage on aggregate but saw their lead reduced to only 1 goal by half-time. The Italians came out much calmer and more organized in the second half and were able to maintain their slim lead to ensure their qualification to the Champions League Quarter-Final.

Arsene Wenger effectively only had 13 players to choose from as the Arsenal squad has been riddled with injuries. Diaby, Benayoun, Ramsey, Arteta, Wilshere, Santos, and  Mertesacker, were all unavailable for selection. There were also doubts about whether Rosicky and Gibbs would feature in the game. Wenger tried to field his usual 4-2-3-1 formation, but it would also turn into a 4-3-3 or a 4-2-4 due to the natural position and mentality of the players on the pitch.


Allegri didn’t have an easier time with his squad selection either as Milan have also been struggling with injuries throughout the season. The unavailability of Kevin-Prince Boateng due to injury, and the suspension of Ambrosini, meant that Allegri couldn’t field his preferred formation. Acquilani was an option, but he wasn't fit enough to for 90 minutes so with only 3 midfielders to choose from, Allegri had little choice but to deploy a 4-3-3 formation. 


 Arsenal didn’t waste any time getting into the game as they went into overdrive from the first minute pressuring Milan’s defense and midfield and controlling the ball well. They saw their efforts pay off in the 6th minute from their second corner kick of the game. Laurent Koscielny gave Mark Van Bommel the run around and met Chamberlain’s cross with a precise header into the net.

AC Milan looked shaken up by the early goal, just the start that Arsenal needed to mount a historic comeback. Arsenal continued their attacking pressure and had a great attempt from Van Persie saved by Abbiati. They played the offside trap well, and pushed high up the field, forcing the confused Milan side into playing aimless long balls. In the 26th minute, Arsenal got their second goal from a poor clearance by Thiago Silva deep in his own box after Mesbah failed to close down Walcott for yet another time. Rosicky controlled the ball well and finished it off with a right footed shot into the bottom right corner of the net. Arsenal were half-way there, and it wasn’t even half-time yet.

Milan tried to break Arsenal’s momentum several times during the game by playing short easy passes in their own half, but the fear that consumed the Italians combined with the high pressure from Arsenal rendered that tactic ineffective. Mesbah continued his display of atrocious defending by conceding a penalty as he obstructed Walcott’s run. Van Persie steps up to the spot and makes it 3-0 on the 43rd minute.  

A Déjà vu moment for Milan fans as memories from their dramatic exit to Deportivo in 2004 were brought to life, squandering a 4-1 home lead, to lose 4-0 away. After-all , the last time Milan were down 3-0 at half time in the Champions League was at Deportivo, a game which they would go on to lose 4-0.

Milan managed to create a great chance in the remaining time that would've put them at east, but El-Shaarawy squandered it wide.

Half-time was intense for both sets of fans, Arsenal only need 1 more goal to equalize, and the way things are going, they could score 2 or 3! Milan seems nervous and disorganized, and they only have 15 minutes to sort themselves out.

In the second half, Milan looked much more confident in possession. They tightened up at the back, closed down effectively, and started to get back into the game. Whatever it is the coach said at half-time seemed to work. It wasn’t until the 59th minute that Arsenal had their first and only chance of the second half as Van Bommel was dispossessed by Rosicky in midfield which gave way to a 3v2 opportunity on the counter attack. Abbiati conjured up a miraculous double-save to first deflect Gervinho’s shot and then block Van Persie’s chip.

Milan made the first substitution on the 70th minute, bringing on Aquilani for El Shaarawy. This meant that Allegri changed to his preferred  4-3-1-2 system with Nocerino moving to the left side of midfield and Emmanuelson playing behind the two strikers.Wenger made 2 forced substitutions due to injuries. Chamakh was brought on to replace Chamberlain on the 75th minute, and Park-Chu Young took the place of Walcott. With that, Arsenal effectively subbed off their two most effective players as their substitutes had no impact on the game.

With more men in midfield, and with the Arsenal players beginning to tire, Milan began to dominate the game and went on to create 4 chances, one of which was a sitter that Nocerino couldn't convert. The game finally ended without much pressure on Milan’s goal as one would’ve expected in the dying minutes of the game.

AC Milan got away with a terrible performance in the first half. They will perhaps be humbled by this defeat as they made the same mistake that Arsenal did in the first leg… They thought it was going to be easy.

Closing Points:

·         Arsenal attacked Milan’s weak point focusing most of their attacks down the right (Milan’s left), which is what they should’ve done in the first leg as well.

·         Mesbah had a terrible Champions League debut. Walcott and Chamberlain beat him almost every time. He failed to block the cross that led to the second goal, and had his back to the ball as he conceded the penalty. Mesbah also added no value when he pushed forward, lost the ball a few times and exposed his team to dangerous attacks from his side.

·         Koscielny and Vermaelen had a great game and were successful in limiting Ibrahimovic’s danger, but the striker looked tired and wasn’t having a good game; He was caught offside 6 times and lost the ball on many occasions. This was partly due to the unnatural position he was required to play in for most of the game.

·         Van Bommel’s yellow card in the 5th minute of the game tamed him for the rest of the match as he couldn’t use as much muscle as he’d like without the risk of getting himself sent off.  This gave Arsenal a good advantage in midfield.

·         Robinho is not effective when he plays in the center of a 4-3-3. Ibrahimovic in the center, with Robinho and El-Shaarawy on either side would’ve been a much more suitable strategy.




Monday 5 March 2012

Another One Bites the Dust - AVB Axed!



Over the years, I’ve observed two general extremes of football management styles. The first extreme is characterized by micromanagement and mainly result oriented, similar to the management style of Rafa Benitez, Hector Cooper, and Louis Van Gaal.  They are seen as an authority figure; they put in place strict rules, schedules, and shout out specific instructions. These types of managers will not spend time with players, discuss their concerns, and have no room for small talk. Their primary tool for motivation is fear. Perform well or you’ll be dropped from the squad! They are not particularly liked, praised, or backed by their players, but nonetheless, their personality and demeanor usually commands respect in the dressing room. The success or failure of these managers depends heavily on delivering consistent results. Once the results start to go against the team, the manager becomes unapproachable, the rules becomes stricter, the players lose their confidence as fear no longer motivates them, and inevitably, the manager loses his job. 

The other extreme is a more relaxed environment that is mainly player focused. An example of this would be the management styles of Wenger, Ancelotti, Guardiola and Mourinho. These managers, while also authoritative in nature, as any good leader would be, try to form bonds with their players.  They command respect by making time for each player, discussing their concerns and assuring them of their value and abilities, always striving to bring out the best in their players. Under these managers, instead of imposing strict rules and schedules, the players discipline themselves as they look forward to their training sessions and working with their coaches. With this type of manager in charge, his players go out onto the field with confidence and are quick to overturn a bad run of form.
While managers who practice both styles can be tactical geniuses, it is usually the latter that has seen the most success in recent years.

Andreas Villas Boas
Nurtured under Bobby Robson and Jose Mourinho, Manager Andreas Villas-Boas made a name for himself in Porto, where he went a whole season undefeated. He broke records for most consecutive wins and most points captured in the Portuguese league. With no experience as a professional football player, and only 9 months of coaching experience at the Academy Level, Villas-Boas took the helm at Porto and went on to win 4 trophies in his first year in football management. It was a dream start to AVB’s career and it caught the attention of Abramovich, who forked out 15 million Euros to bring the young magician to take charge of Chelsea – believing him to be the Alchemist with the Philosopher’s stone who will finally deliver the Champions League trophy that has eluded the club for so long.
Andreas Villas-Boas got off to a good start with his new team winning 9 out of his first 12 matches. Performances began to deteriorate in mid-December, however, as Chelsea were not able to find a win in 4 consecutive games, January was a little bit brighter as the team won 4 of their 6 games, but it wasn’t long before the sun set again on AVB and Chelsea, with their latest run extending to only 1 win in 7 matches including a 3-1 Champions League defeat at the hands of Napoli. The odds were stacked against the young manager, and after only 256 days in charge, Andreas Villas-Boas got the inevitable ax.

Why did Andreas Villas-Boas fail?
It has little to do with his football knowledge, tactics and technical aptitude. The primary culprit was AVB’s management style.
AVB adopted a result focused micro-management style; he implemented strict rules and became overly obsessed with the details. Despite his vigorous work ethics, always being the first to arrive and the last to leave, and often drowning himself with technical data and research, AVB failed to address the most pressing problem. With every passing day, his players grew tired of their manager monitoring their every move, and with results going against them, it allowed the players to scrutinize every decision their manager makes.   
A man with minimal coaching experience was given the task of dealing with accomplished players who are of a similar age group. For a player like Lampard, Terry, Cech, or Anelka to actually listen to AVB and treat him not only as an equal, but as a superior requires great charisma and man management skills - two traits that AVB lacked. It was no surprise that as soon as AVB announced his no-Lampard lineup, tension began to mount.
Excluding Lampard is something AVB should have avoided if he were a bit wiser. Lampard is still one of the best players at Chelsea –In all competitions this season; Lampard has scored the most goals, and has the second highest assist tally.  As a newcomer, the boss must try to keep the club’s most influential players on his side. Had that happened, there would have been more unity and team spirit in the dressing room and on the field. Alas, it seems Villas-Boas’ ego caught up with him – with an overly aggressive attitude and the mindset of turning the whole club around, AVB expected everyone to do his bidding.
Football management includes a tactical aspect as well as a management aspect; AVB’s short stint at Chelsea does not imply that he is a poor tactician; however, it does show that if he is to succeed at big clubs, he must adjust his management approach, especially when dealing with world class players and big egos.

Ultimately, the blame lies on Abramovich’s shoulders.
The Russian billionaire paid 15 million Euros for a largely unproven manager who won 4 titles in the first year of his career, to replace Carlo Ancelotti, a world class manager who has won 14 major trophies, including 2 Champions Leagues, during his 17 years of experience as a manager with top European clubs.
Ancelotti won the Premier League and the FA Cup in his first season in charge at Chelsea. In his second season, Chelsea finished 2nd, only 3 points behind eventual winners Manchester United, who also eliminated Chelsea in the Quarter Finals of the Champions League. Ancelotti had expressed, more than once, his desire to keep his job but despite achieving the highest win ratio of his career at Stamford Bridge (61.5%), he was still given the sack.
Simply put, Abramovich made a terrible mistake for which Chelsea may have to pay a heavy price. The squad will now have to pull together to salvage a valuable 4th place finish from a largely disappointing season.

Thursday 1 March 2012

LEBANON MAKE HISTORY!



Despite losing 4-2 in their World Cup Qualifier match against UAE yesterday, Lebanon secured their spot in the final round of the Asian Qualifiers for the first time in their footballing history.


In September 2011, Lebanon played their first group match of the Asian Qualifiers and succumbed to a 6-0 defeat at the hands of South Korea, an expected result for fans and pundits, after-all, Lebanon represented little threat to the other teams in their group which included Kuwait, UAE and South Korea.

4 days later, however, Lebanon hosted the UAE national team and shockingly defeated the UAE side 3-1, to take home their first 3 points.  The UAE FA subsequently sacked their coach Srecko Katanec, after what was deemed to be a “Humiliating Defeat”.  Just a one-off result was the general consensus until a month later when Lebanon hosted Kuwait. Although the odds were in favor of the Kuwaiti side, they were saved from the brink of defeat in the dying minutes of the game through an own goal. 2-2 was the final score and the Lebanese National team began attracting some attention. With 3 games left to play, Lebanon found themselves still in contention for qualification.

In November 2011, Lebanon travelled to Kuwait, and once more, against expectations, defeated the Kuwaiti National team 1-0 in front of their own fans. This was a huge result for Lebanon as they were now 2nd in their group, unprecedented territory for the team and fans. It was at this point that the Lebanese people began to take notice of their national team’s progress. There were only 2 games left and the possibility of qualifying to the next round had never been closer for Lebanon. Their next fixture, however, was against South Korea; the team that beat them by 6 goals only 2 months ago.

The fans flocked to the stadium like never before as Lebanon hosted South Korea and once more pulled off a miraculous 2-1 victory against the mighty South Koreans. They had now almost cemented their place in the second round and would only need a draw against UAE to guarantee qualification. Even a loss would suffice as long as South Korea does not lose their final encounter with Kuwait. Their chances were looking good and were enough cause for early celebration ahead of their last remaining fixture against UAE which took place yesterday.

Although it was an away game played on Emarati soil, Lebanese citizens from all over the world booked their tickets to the UAE and flocked to the Al Nahyan Stadium effectively making it their own by vastly outnumbering the home crowd. The game was played out at a good pace with plenty of goal, with the UAE edging out their opponents 4-2 to earn their first 3 points in the competition to serve as consolation.

Lebanese fans were left a little disappointed by the result, but they shouldn’t be! The team has come a long way from being mere pushovers, to being able to actually compete with their Asian counterparts. With limited budgets, coaching staff, and training facilities, piled on top of the fact that the footballing profession in Lebanon is regarded as a “part-time hobby”, the team has been greatly over-achieving and has given the Lebanese population a common interest to shout about.


UAE 4–2 Lebanon: Match Analysis

Lebanon coach, Thoe Bucker, fielded a 4-1-3-2 formation with El Ali playing as a striker with Maatouk behind him on the left.  Zreik, Atwi, and Shamas were in midfield with Faour playing in front of the defense as a holding midfielder. At the back, Mohamad, Dyoub, Najarin, and Ismail were selected, and second goalkeeper Mognieh was given the nod ahead of Samad.

The UAE played a 4-3-3 system with  Khaseif guarding the posts; Saeed, Jaber , Juma, and Al Marzouqi in defense, Al Wehaibi, Al Hosani, and Abbas in midfield, and Matar, Qasem, and Obaid up front.

Fueled by the cheers of their supporters, the game started off at a good pace with Lebanon attacking their opponents in the first few minutes. It took around 10 minutes for the Emaratis to get into the game and put some pressure on the Lebanese defense that played a physical game and conceded a number of free kicks.

In the 20th minute, Saeed scored the first goal of the game from what should have been a simple free-kick for the goalie to deal with, the Lebanese goalkeeper made a mess off the ball as it slipped out of his hands into the back of the net.  

The lead didn’t last long for the UAE as 3 minutes later El Ali got on the end of a through ball and burst his way past the last defender before calmly placing the ball into the back of the net to grab the equalizer for the visitors. El Ali had to be subbed immediately after scoring due to his clash with Khaseif in the play that led up to the goal. Akram Moghrabi took his place in attack.

UAE scored their second goal on the 38th minute from a lovely build up play when Obaid got past his marker on the right side of the field to put in a cross for Matar who set it up for a nice finish by Al Wehaibi to make it 2-1.

Once again, UAE couldn’t hold on to their lead as only a minute before the half time whistle, Maatouk expertly controlled the ball from a cross, receiving it with his right foot, getting past his marker, and applying the finish with his left into the bottom right corner of the net. 2-2 was the score at the halfway mark.

UAE controlled the second half of the game forcing Lebanon to fall back into their own half. The Lebanese defense looked organized enough to cope with the pressure from UAE’s play but eventually conceded in the 69th minute from a magnificent free-kick taken by Matar. From the edge of the box, Matar blasted a fierce shot into the top right corner of the net to give his team the lead for the third time.

After conceding the goal, Lebanon continued to give away possession in the middle of the pitch and were never really able to get back into the game. With 10 minutes left to go, UAE added a cushion to their lead from an indirect free-kick. Matar played the ball to Saeed, who was left unmarked on the edge of the penalty area; Saeed did not waste the opportunity to add another goal to his tally. 4-2 the final result.

Closing Points:

*  UAE played well and looked organized for a team that has undergone a massive overhaul- especially in the second half. Although they only managed to break down the Lebanese defense once from their build-up play, they controlled the game and their first win in 6 games will serve to build up their confidence.

* Set pieces are a basic part of the game and defending them should be a fundamental training aspect; an area that requires much attention for Lebanon having conceded 3 out of the 4 goals from dead ball situations:

-   While it’s easy to blame the goalie for the first one, the shot shouldn’t be getting past the wall so easily.

-   The second free-kick goal by Matar, although spectacularly taken, a properly placed defensive wall of    3  players, not 2, would have made it much more difficult.

-  The 3rd goal from an indirect free-kick was a perfect example of bad defending from set-piece situations.

* Lebanon had several moments in the game (especially in the second half when they were tied at 2-2) where they could have kept possession in midfield through short easy passes, slowed down the tempo, and given themselves a breather. They instead opted to play hopeful long balls and dangerous dribbles opening themselves up to counter-attacks time after time.

*  Lebanon’s formation was quite narrow focusing most of their attacks through the middle, UAE caught on to that in the second half as they began to tighten up their center to counter the predictable Lebanese strategy.


* With a 3 man midfield, the fullbacks have to push up to provide support in the channel. The Lebanese fullbacks, Ismail and Mohamad, rarely pushed forward to try and provide passing options to the 3 men in the middle. 

* Lebanon has a pacey and talented player in Maatouk and could be better utilized on the left wing instead of the more central role he was playing in today.  

* Antar’s absence was heavily felt by the team as he provides guidance, organization, and a sense of calm to his team mates.